Christie Brinkley's long and bitter divorce from architect Peter Cook has reached new lows. Sources say that she wants the details of their split to be made public because "she's still spitting mad" at him.
The couple announced their separation in 2006 when it was revealed that Cook had had an affair with an 18 year old assistant. At the time, he apologized, saying, "I'm sorry. I'm contrite. I'm stupid. Foolish. No excuse."
Now, Brinkley claims that Cook "trolled Internet porn sites, including swinger sites in search of women."
These are apparently the kind of details she wants to reveal? I don't understand why that's so newsworthy, or what purpose it would serve except to humiliate them both, not to mention their children. Who, by the way, have their own lawyer - who plans to ask the judge to keep the case private.
Comments